React offers two ways to define components: they can be functional or class-based. If you are new to React, you may be wondering what the difference is between them. The React documentation doesn’t clearly explain when and why you would use one or the other, and what the pros and cons of each type are.
In this article I will help you understand the difference between functional and class-based components. You will know why you may prefer one over another.
If you ever tried to pass a parameter to onClick event handler, you know that it is not straightforward.
If you didn’t, here is why may want to. Imagine a scenario where you have a group of three buttons. When you click on one of them, you want to know which one was clicked and perform an appropriate action. You have a choice of creating three onClick event handlers, one for each button, or one hander for all the buttons and pass a parameter identifying the clicked button into it. Which option do you choose? Clearly writing one handler should be less work, right?
Unfortunately, passing a parameter into an event handler in React is not straightforward. If it were, there wouldn’t be multi-page discussions about just that. By the way, the accepted answer on that Stackoverflow thread lists an “Easy way” along with “Better way” and an “Old easy way”. The “Easy way” is indeed easier, but has a performance impact. And a “Better way” is in fact not that easy. Is that confusing, or is that just me?
However, don’t despair! I will show you how you can pass not even one, but multiple parameters into an onClick event handler. In fact, you can apply the same technique to any React event handler. That approach is both easy to implement and has no performance impact.
A flight controller is the brain of any multirotor; it is the most crucial component. When my Alien 560 quadcopterfell from the sky, I figured it happened because its flight controller malfunctioned mid-flight. Therefore, when I decided to build a new drone and started choosing the components, a flight controller was the most difficult choice to make.
About a year ago Hobbyking was having one of their “Flash Sale” events. During a few days, they dropped prices on a few hundred items. An online shopaholic in me couldn’t miss it. I meticulously studied the offerings until I found something worthy of my attention and money. That was a Jumper 218 Pro racing quadcopter, almost ready to run. A bargain at a just a bit over $100! I just needed to add an RC receiver.
I received it a few days later and, as it often happens, put it on a shelf for a few months. From time to time I would take it off the shelf, hold it in my hands, make a few plans for it, and then put it back. At the time I was still concentrating on building my Alien 560 quadcopter, and the smaller drone was a distraction. The “project Alien” appeared to be never-ending. Every time I flew it, I saw a way to improve it. I would disassemble the copter and work on it for a week or two. Then put it back together, fly it, and then dismantle again. Only when I crashed the Alien, I decided to take a break from it and turned my attention to the Jumper.
There is a subtle issue for which, unfortunately, neither ES6 nor proxyquire provide a solution. It is well described in this stackoverflow.com answer.
So far in the previous articles of the series, the dependencies we were mocking were in a separate module from the code we were unit testing. But what if they were in the same module?